My Trek 7.3 FX Hybrid Bike Review

I use a 63cm Trek Madone 5.2 for weekend riding and commuting to work, but I changed jobs to a more undesirable part of town with a commute that was too long for cycling. I still craved a bike for occasional early morning spins or lunch time jaunts.

I wanted something relatively cheap (under $1000), not flashy to avoid theft, (dark colored or single toned if possible), durable, at least a 63 cm frame, wide tires for potholes, average weight, a semi-road bike geometry for comfort if I needed to do a long ride, no real need for disk brakes and no weight from shock absorbers I wouldn’t need.

I went to at least a dozen bike shops and tested models from Bianchi, Specialized, K2, LeMond, Kona, Cannondale, Raleigh, Giant and more. None had frames that were big enough, only Trek did.

The road bike lines were either too expensive or delicate for what I wanted. The Trek Cyclocross XO models were tempting, but were either brightly colored or beyond the budget. The Portland was similarly affected.

The Trek 520 was an option, but my new job is near the sea and I was concerned about rusting with the steel frame. I also was concerned about the difficulty of using the friction down tube shifters in rapidly changing traffic conditions.

I quickly learned that the Trek FX, SU, Soho and 7000 series all share the same basic frame. Some have disk brakes and others have handle bars that sprout upward to tempt you to eat an ice cream cone while riding along the boardwalk. The rest just look like road bikes without the loopy handle bars.

The Trek Soho and SU models met most of my criteria, but they were not in stock in any of the bike stores I visited. I didn’t have ice cream plans, so the 7000s didn’t fit the bill.

It quickly came down to the FX series.

Having significantly limited my choices I reviewed the entire line from the 7.2 FX through to the 7.9 FX. The 7.6 FX with the carbon fork and rear stays was tempting. It was lightweight, and just slightly over budget, but the 22.5″ maximum frame size was too small. The frame color also contrasted against the black carbon fiber parts, making it more noticeable. The 7.5 FX was cheaper, but only came in the smaller frame size and was available only in bright red.

It came down to a black 25″ 7.3 FX. (It comes in other colors too) I agonized over the weight difference between it and the more expensive models in the line, but with clipless pedals the difference was barely noticeable on the legs. There was a pronounced weight difference between the two, but I was comparing models with different frame sizes. This really didn’t matter as I didn’t intend to do racing where a couple pounds could make a big difference.

The $500 price was right especially as I was not sure of what my riding schedule at would be. Spending a lot to have a bike decorate my desk area would be a waste. At least with this sticker it could be tolerable.

My experience with bike shops has been eye opening. There is an overwhelming desire to sell what they have in stock, especially after Christmas, whether or not it meets your criteria. I’m tall, and a 25″ / 63cm frame is a little small, yet many 59cm models were recommended. I have ridden frames that are too small; talk to my knees and wrists for the whole agonizing story.

The other thing you have to watch out for is the guilt trip you sign up for when components are discussed. If you don’t have Ultegra, Dura-Ace, or 105 then you’re a nobody. Well I had a nobody budget, and when the component cogs begin to wear down in a year of hypothetical constant Indiana Jones riding, I’ll see whether it’s in my budget to replace or upgrade them on this run-around bike. I’ve used Ultegra and 105 on other bikes. Ultegra does shift slightly better, and from the bike shop assistants perspective they are “more durable” in an unquantifiable sort of way, but for group rides with friends and commuting I don’t really care.

Light weight carbon fiber forks, frames and seat posts were the other big things I was up-sold on. When I asked about upgrading to a carbon fork on a cheap bike, they all told me that investing in lighter wheels would be much more effective. Guess what I did when the budget permitted.

The dampening effect of carbon on road vibration was another selling point. That may be true, but carbon attracts theft, and it was unlikely I’d be riding a distance long enough for its effect to be felt. A pair of gel padded shorts could work just fine on those few occasions. I already have some.

On the 7.3 FX, I swapped out the handle bars for a flat one which gives me a slightly lower stance similar to a road bike and bar ends to give me different hand positions on the handle bars. I also use clipless pedals and a longer stem. I also invested in a good saddle. Bikes are notorious for coming with cheap seats that are good enough for the showroom, but become a pain in the rear on longer rides. Everything else is stock.

I have taken it out on a number of 13 mile loops with a steep 200 ft climb over 2500 ft distance, 600 ft of climbing in total. The 7.3 FX handles it well, especially on damp roads where the traction of the wider tires is welcome. The downhill speed is slowed by the rolling resistance of the tires, but on steep slopes this is a benefit. The 7.3 FX’s stability and better braking is much more noticeable than with the Madone in such conditions. I have ridden it up a 5 mile bumpy paved mountain road rising 2000 ft. It handled capably. On the descent I didn’t have to cringe with every jarring jolt and sudden curve like I would do on the lighter carbon frame of the Madone.

My Madone has both a compact crank and a large 11-27 cassette customization to help me with steep hills, but the climbing gear ratios are slightly less favorable than that of the FX 7.3. I also feel the more relaxed stance of the FX 7.3 makes it easier to ride uphill than on the true road bike. It’s slower due to the easy “granny” gearing, but this makes it more enjoyable.

At high speeds the Madone is noticeably faster. The FX 7.3’s greater weight, wide tires, lower gearing and less efficient rider stance takes its toll. This increases the temptation to over exert yourself to get true road bike speeds on the FX 7.3. If you relax and accept the 20% speed reduction it can be quite an enjoyable ride especially as the tires absorb a lot of road vibration.

This is a very capable cost effective bike. Perfect for those who have made a New Year’s resolution, or those who want to lose a few pounds when they are not fully sure they will stick with the plan. It’s a bike you can park without worrying too much. With a flat bar the stance is similar to that of a road bike when your hands are on top of the road bike’s handle bars, not down in the loops. This makes it quite comfortable on long rides because more of your weight is supported with your arms, not just your rear like the more relaxed hybrids do. In retrospect I should have started with a model like this for my original 10 mile commute, but I decided to splurge on the Madone. The FX has fixtures for saddle bag panniers or racks in the rear. If I lived in a rainier climate, or the road traffic were chaotic, then I’d consider something with disk brakes. I’ve heard of people using these bikes in century rides and after experiencing it I see that it isn’t inconceivable to do so with skinnier tires. You wouldn’t win, but you’d have a lot of multipurpose fun.

If my physique allowed me more choices then I could be finicky about the subtle differences between brands. Even so, I found the experience as intimidating as choosing a bottle of vintage cabernet at a Napa winery. There was a constant battle between what I wanted and what people thought I should want. The local bike shop references to the DuraAce, Ultegra, and 105 lines of components, carbon fiber, stance and weight brought cartoonish images of sommelier’s prancing around extolling the virtues of bouquet, terroir, microclimates and chocolaty fruitiness.

If I were a competitive racer or professional cyclist, these subtleties would be supremely important, but too often I felt part of a conniving conspiracy to convert a quick spin to pick up a lunch time sandwich into the Tour de France.

So what upgrades would I recommend to new riders with this bike or entry level models in the FX series? A few months later, when your household CFO gives you permission to burn another hole in your wallet, try researching the following:

Clipless pedals and shoes: Confusingly clipless pedals are the ones with ski-boot type clips. The clip types are the ones that look like little baskets attached to the pedals. With clipless pedals and cycling shoes your foot will feel as if has been epoxied to the bike. You can not only push the pedal on the down stroke, but you can also pull it up on the up stroke. I use the mountain bike style shoes which have a rubber sole. They allow me to walk without the very unstable, noisy and silly looking waddle that road bike shoes provide. One day I’ll become obsessively preoccupied by weight, and counting every gram I’ll buy a pair of road bike shoes so I can look macho in that hot pants sort of way, but not right now. This combination can drop 5 to 10 minutes off a one hour ride. If specialized shoes are a too much too soon, or you are uncommitted to riding but want a little more zip, then try different tires.

Lighter / slicker tires: The 7.3 FX comes with 700×32C tires that are ideal for rough roads and trails of unpredictable quality. The 32mm wide tire absorbs a lot of punishment without puncturing and helps to provide a soft ride. They do make the bike slower than a true road bike and there are times when you could over stress your knees if you decide to keep up with them. I had this problem at work where a motley crew of us ride a 10 mile circuit at lunch time and the poor 7.3 FX just couldn’t keep up. I probably slowed them down by 10 minutes over the circuit while they patiently waited for me at the top of each hill. This time can be significant if you have to catch a post lunch meeting and I felt very guilty.

There are days when I feel joy should result from reduced effort. Everyone needs less pain, more gain sometimes. So I invested in narrower 700×25C tires and can now hold my head up high. The difference was definitely noticeable, a little faster with a lot less stress on the knees. I could now easily keep up with the group. I also had to buy slightly thinner inner tubes too as the old ones wouldn’t fit. Just remember that the 700×25C tire may be too delicate for riding in Manhattan, or cruising along a muddy fire road. They may also not be the right choice at the beginning of your diet, ask your bike shop for their advice.

Lighter wheels: I don’t think these are worthwhile. You need a heavy rim for commuting. The gains from improved tires will outweigh the slight additional benefit of this upgrade. If bragging rights are involved, well, that’s a different story. In the past, I succumbed to this temptation in the past on a hybrid bike. The gain from a tire change is unquestionably superior to the improvement due to lighter wheels. Lose the weight from your midriff and save the money for your “road bike fund”.

Carbon Fork: There are a some benefits to adding a carbon fork. They are a little lighter, and there is an unquantifiable assertion of less vibration. Unfortunately after market forks can be expensive, sometimes rivaling the cost of a second hand hybrid bike in good condition. If you like to tinker, well go ahead, but a better investment would be to drink less sodas and save the money for your “road bike fund”.

Summary: I now leave my hybrid at work and ride it at lunch time two days a week. The midday workout really invigorates my day. If you want a fun, general purpose bike, then make no modifications. The benefit of the hybrid is that if you start to enjoy your New Year’s resolution to lose a few pounds and choose to evolve into a more serious cyclist, then the upgrade path to near road bike performance with clipless pedals and 700×25C tires is affordable.

Bike companies buy their components at discounts of up to 70%, so upgrading components at the retail store easily becomes uneconomical especially when labor costs are included. If you feel a strong need for more improvements, just buy a new bike and forget this one. Remember, that when you do, Shimano 105 components are the best top end choice for the “not so sure, well maybe, I have a budget, I really should start a diet” road bike cyclist no matter what the sales assistant tells you. Instead of investing in a lighter bike, get skinnier tires, ask about a compact crank and get into a bike routine that helps you lose some pounds. I’m not too proud to say I have made that mistake before.

In my opinion, aluminum framed hybrid bikes with a near road bike geometry are a good choice for commuting and fun rides that could turn into longer adventures on asphalt or gravel. This is true no matter what brand you buy. The 7.3 FX was the right choice for me and my specific needs for a second bike. This could be true for you.

How Times Have Changed

A recent BBC article outlines a war of words between the Venezuelan and Spanish heads of state at the recent Ibero-American summit in Chile. Even King Juan Carlos of Spain became involved.

The series of events seems farcical, but there was a serious undertone.

Mr. Chavez called former Spanish Prime Minister Aznar, a close ally of US President George W Bush, a fascist, adding “fascists are not human. A snake is more human.”

Mr Zapatero, the current Prime Minister responsed saying: “Aznar was democratically elected by the Spanish people and was a legitimate representative of the Spanish people.” He also continued to say “I think there is an essential principle to dialogue, and that is, to respect and be respected; we should be careful not to fall into insults.”

Despite his microphone being turned off, Mr. Chavez repeatedly tried to interrupt. The king then leaned forward and said: “Why don’t you shut up?” More specifically he used the diminutive Spanish phrase “Por que no te callas?” often used when scolding children.

The king then stormed out of the conference.

“I do not offend by telling the truth,” Mr. Chavez later responded, “The Venezuelan government reserves the right to respond to any aggression, anywhere, in any space and in any manner.” He also gave some insight into his possible motivations, “Mr. King, did you know about the coup d’etat against Venezuela, against the democratic, legitimate government of Venezuela in 2002?”

Is it real or just theater? Whatever it is, Mr. Chavez seems to have struck a nerve. According to the BBC, “Labeling a Spanish prime minister a fascist carries a serious undertone in Spain, considering the country’s bloody civil war and General Franco’s 36-year-long military rule that followed.”

This is certainly true. A central theme in much of modern Spanish cinema revolves around the years of the Spanish Civil War and subsequent dictatorship. It is a topic that clearly evokes emotion in the country’s population.

Spain’s national newspapers echoed this sentiment. El Mundo’s opinion was clear. “The king has put Chavez in his place in the name of all Spaniards.” El Pais said Mr. Chavez’s outburst was “intolerable”.

Spain’s Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos clarified his government’s position by saying, “We want to have good relations with everyone, but always with respect for institutions. If we are not shown respect, we must react.”

This spat is also newsworthy because an international conference was used to accuse a foreign power of meddling in the affairs of a sovereign nation. It highlights events of the two-day coup in April 2002 when Aznar called interim President Pedro Carmona, and the Spanish ambassador to Venezuela met with Carmona. Ironically, in December 2004 Moratinos charged that Aznar had in fact given the putsch his diplomatic blessing by citing diplomatic cables from the period and other government documents. Chavez was restored to power after massive street protests.

But why now? There may have been hostility in 2002, but in 2006, more than 50% of the foreign investment in Venezuela came from Spanish firms. Iberian firms have used their capital to bet on Venezuelan stability. The relationship has clearly changed.

Some memories don’t fade away. The question is whether an old ideological conflict will affect the new economic partnership.

Telmex vs Telefónica in Mexico

El Economista reports that Francisco Gil Díaz, the ex finance minister of Mexico, and current president of cell phone provider Telefónica Movistar, has struck against the incumbent fixed line telephone company, Telmex.

By law Telmex cannot provide television services, but Movistar is taking no chances by suggesting that Telmex pay an extra tariff to do so when it becomes privatized. Telmex has naturally objected. The case is now in the hands of the Comisión Intersecretarial de Desincorporación (CID), the body in charge of privatizations in the country, to decide.

Video downloads to cell phones are now available in many markets around the world. Maybe Telmex will counterattack with a tariff proposal of its own.

Worth the Risk?

Colin Powell has some definite views on risk. This passage arrived in my inbox as part of an email chain I received recently.“Once the information is in the 40 to 70 range, go with your gut.” Powell’s advice is don’t take action if you have only enough information to give you less than a 40 percent chance of being right, but don’t wait until you have enough facts to be 100 percent sure, because by then it is almost always too late. His instinct is right: “Today, excessive delays in the name of information-gathering breeds “analysis paralysis”. Procrastination in the name of reducing risk actually increases risk.

When I first read this, it was the 40% that caught my eye. What makes it interesting is that it implies that you can take a risk when the odds could be against you, but also have the goal of making a majority of your decisions have favorable odds. It also advises you not to waste effort over analyzing to get 100% certainty.

The 40% approach would probably be most applicable in long term strategies where a lack of clairvoyance reduces expectations of success. In these cases the key would be to make many small bets, and concentrate resources on those bets that turn the corner as the future becomes clearer.

He’s describing a tactic applicable with many life experiences be they business, military or personal.

An Interview with Uwe Thiem of SchoolNet Namibia

Namibia’s open source based SchoolNet project provides computer labs to schools all across the country. Some are in very remote locations that are not traditionally suitable for this type of technology. It has been quite successful and has won many international awards.

SchoolNet was recently mentioned in a post on the OpenFree forums, and I was interested to learn more. I eventually managed to get in contact Uwe Thiem, SchoolNet’s network administrator, who was willing to answer a few questions by email.

His views on the fundamental prerequisites for the successful deployment of technology in education are insightful. The OpenFree exclusive interview has been getting many comments. Take a look and see why.

Thanks Uwe!